Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Academic Performance: A Cross-National Study of University Students’ Adoption of AI-Assisted Learning Tools

Authors

  • Edward Vincent Legaspi Batangas State University, Batangas City, Philippines
  • Lorraine Isabelle Batangas State University, Batangas City, Philippines
  • Patrick Julius Yumul Batangas State University, Batangas City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63876/jets.v1i2.46

Keywords:

AI Literacy, Academic Performance, AI-Assisted Learning, University Students, Cross-National Study, Technology Adoption

Abstract

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted learning tools has reshaped university learning practices across diverse educational systems. However, the relationship between students’ AI literacy, adoption behavior, and academic performance remains insufficiently understood, particularly from a cross-national perspective. This study investigates how AI literacy influences the adoption of AI-assisted learning tools and its association with academic performance among university students in different countries. Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from university students across multiple national contexts and analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression modeling, and comparative analysis. The findings indicate that students with higher AI literacy demonstrate greater confidence, frequency, and effectiveness in using AI-assisted learning tools for academic tasks such as information retrieval, writing support, problem-solving, and formative feedback. AI literacy was found to have a positive relationship with academic performance, mediated by responsible and purposeful AI tool adoption. Cross-national differences also reveal that institutional support, digital infrastructure, ethical awareness, and prior exposure to educational technology significantly shape students’ adoption patterns. Nevertheless, the study identifies potential risks, including over-reliance, unequal access, and limited critical evaluation of AI-generated outputs. This research contributes to the growing literature on AI in higher education by providing empirical insight into the role of AI literacy as a key factor in effective AI-assisted learning. The study highlights the need for universities to integrate AI literacy into curricula, promote ethical AI use, and develop inclusive learning policies that support equitable academic outcomes in digitally mediated education environments.

References

[1] L. Benichou, “The role of using ChatGPT AI in writing medical scientific articles,” Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 124, no. 5, p. 101456, Oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101456.

[2] A. Nazir and Z. Wang, “A comprehensive survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, applications, prospects, and challenges,” Meta-Radiology, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 100022, Sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100022.

[3] P. Lin, “ChatGPT: Friend or foe (to corpus linguists)?,” Applied Corpus Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 100065, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100065.

[4] A. Maeda-Minami et al., “Development of a novel drug information provision system for Kampo medicine using natural language processing technology,” BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 119, Jul. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02230-3.

[5] J. Chai, H. Zeng, A. Li, and E. W. T. Ngai, “Deep learning in computer vision: A critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios,” Machine Learning with Applications, vol. 6, p. 100134, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100134.

[6] D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, S. K. W. Chu, and M. S. Qiao, “Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100041, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041.

[7] E. Schwitzgebel, “AI systems must not confuse users about their sentience or moral status,” Patterns, vol. 4, no. 8, p. 100818, Aug. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100818.

[8] M. Biagioli, M. Kenney, B. R. Martin, and J. P. Walsh, “Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment,” Research Policy, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 401–413, Mar. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.025.

[9] M. Mehrvarz, E. Heidari, M. Farrokhnia, and O. Noroozi, “The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and their academic performance,” Computers & Education, vol. 167, p. 104184, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184.

[10] A. Aman-Ullah, R. Abd Hamid, and M. H. Abu Hassan, “A mediation study of appreciation culture with academic backgrounds, parents’ involvement, absorption capacity and academic performance,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 2352–2365, Oct. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2024-0010.

[11] A. Khamaj and A. M. Ali, “Adapting user experience with reinforcement learning: Personalizing interfaces based on user behavior analysis in real-time,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 95, pp. 164–173, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.045.

[12] X. Lu, W. Wang, B. A. Motz, W. Ye, and N. T. Heffernan, “Immediate text-based feedback timing on foreign language online assignments: How immediate should immediate feedback be?,” Computers and Education Open, vol. 5, p. 100148, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100148.

[13] S. Sutradhar, S. Karforma, R. Bose, S. Roy, S. Djebali, and D. Bhattacharyya, “Enhancing identity and access management using Hyperledger Fabric and OAuth 2.0: A block-chain-based approach for security and scalability for healthcare industry,” Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 4, pp. 49–67, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.07.004.

[14] P. Jehiel and J. Singh, “Multi-state choices with aggregate feedback on unfamiliar alternatives,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 130, pp. 1–24, Nov. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2021.07.007.

[15] G. Ghirardi, C. J. Gil-Hernández, F. Bernardi, E. Van Bergen, and P. Demange, “Interaction of family SES with children’s genetic propensity for cognitive and noncognitive skills: No evidence of the Scarr-Rowe hypothesis for educational outcomes,” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, vol. 92, p. 100960, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100960.

[16] S. P. Desai, S. Hanji, M. Munshi, and C. Pabba, “Exploring the moderating role of group engagement on instructional methods and academic performance: a deep learning approach,” The TQM Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 493–510, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2024-0433.

[17] X. Yao and Y. Xi, “Pathways linking expectations for AI chatbots to loyalty: A moderated mediation analysis,” Technology in Society, vol. 78, p. 102625, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102625.

[18] S. Yao, L. Xie, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, and M. Gao, “Influence of perceived safety in the technology acceptance model,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 99, pp. 36–51, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.010.

[19] N. Hallowell, S. Badger, F. McKay, A. Kerasidou, and C. Nellåker, “Democratising or disrupting diagnosis? Ethical issues raised by the use of AI tools for rare disease diagnosis,” SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, vol. 3, p. 100240, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100240.

[20] B. Chen, X. Zhu, and F. Díaz Del Castillo H., “Integrating generative AI in knowledge building,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, p. 100184, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100184.

[21] J. Yang, “Insight into the potential of algorithms using AI technology as in vitro diagnostics utilizing microbial extracellular vesicles,” Molecular and Cellular Probes, vol. 78, p. 101992, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2024.101992.

[22] A. Bressane et al., “Understanding the role of study strategies and learning disabilities on student academic performance to enhance educational approaches: A proposal using artificial intelligence,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, p. 100196, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100196.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-03

How to Cite

Legaspi, E. V., Isabelle, L., & Yumul, P. J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Academic Performance: A Cross-National Study of University Students’ Adoption of AI-Assisted Learning Tools. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 1(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.63876/jets.v1i2.46

Issue

Section

Articles